January 28, 2010

Watched the President’s speech tonight and came away feeling sad as much as anything. Despite my personal dislike of the President and distaste for his politics and policies, I was hoping that a more pragmatic and conciliatory (I dared not to expect humble!) President would present himself tonight, especially given the recent losses of his party in Virginia, New Jersey, and Massachusetts, and recent polls that indicate the dire straits both he and his party is in at this point in the 2010 election season.

So what did we get? Unfortunately, more of the same in the way of high-falutin’ empty rhetoric and promises that, if history is to be judged, he has little or no interest in keeping. To me, that’s OK – after all, that’s what State of the Union speeches are for. By their very nature they’re long, self-serving and congratulating, partisan, and generally pretty boring affairs, so I get that, and, like I say, that’s OK.

What made me sad and truly fearful of this man’s presidency, was the general angry, petty, and condescending tone of his overall speech. The Obama of the 2008 campaign trail had that “hope and change” mantra going, and he could turn a phrase and offer up a self-deprecating jibe at himself and the powers that be in Washington in a way that made him both likeable and approachable (even if that weren’t true).

One year into his presidency, Obama’s SOTU speech was an uninspiring and critical affair where everyone from George W. Bush, Democrats and Republicans, the voters, talk radio, and, yes, even the members of the Supreme Court (sitting directly in front of him) were subject to his barbs and criticism. In fact, the only one who he didn’t blame for the state this country is in at the present was numero uno. This wasn’t a nice speech; it wasn’t gracious, it wasn’t hopeful, it certainly wasn’t classy, and more than that, it wasn’t presidential.

I think National Review Online’s Yuval Levin put it best:

…But on the whole, this was really an incredibly graceless, self-righteous, and grouchy performance. It had a lot of what’s bad about Obama’s speeches (he said “I” almost a hundred times, repeatedly referred to his campaign as though it were a great American story we all love, continued to blame Bush for everything under the sun even as he said he was “not interested in re-litigating the past,” and piled clichés sky high) but none of what’s good about his speeches—the simple theme simply pursued. It was a very Clintonian speech without Clinton’s human charm.

I truly believe tonight’s speech marks the beginning of the end of Barack Obama’s presidency, and that makes me sad. Not for the person, since I truly believe Barack Obama’s true goal has always been to destroy capitalism and the socio-economic fabric of the United States, and he and the hoodlums and cronies he has surrounded himself with get what they deserve, but for all those people who truly believed the hype and aura candidate Obama’s team created around him. Obama was different. Obama would make everything right, Obama would usher in a new “era of good feeling”.

Sure, he might still be able to turn a phrase when read off a TelePrompTer, but how sad it is that in just a little over two years Mr. “Hopenchange” has revealed himself to be a thin-skinned, bitter, unprepared, detached, aloof, and arrogant politician unwilling to admit his own mistakes and lacking in any kind of graciousness and class typically associated with the office of the President of the United States.

I’m not saying there isn’t room in an individual elected President for those kinds of negative qualities – hell, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Jimmy Carter had them in spades. But the difference is how you present yourself in public. Barack Obama during the 2008 campaign presented himself as a uniter and someone who by his very nature could transcend the partisan bitterness left over from the George W. Bush years. Tonight, when a little self-deprecating humor and sense of humilty would have gone a long way, he showed himself to be someone lacking in those most basic qualities that people seek in a leader. Leaders don’t play the blame game, leaders lead by example.

Most people, I think, in the end – no matter what the state of things are in the country at a given point in time – want to feel good about their President and their country, want to believe that things are going to get better, and will therefore give the President some leeway in the hope and desire of seeing him succeed. Barack Obama’s angry, bitter, and condescending performance tonight will only serve to polarize the electorate further and make the task of those who earnestly want both him and his presidency to succeed all the more tougher.

Filed in: Politics & World Events by The Great White Shank at 00:40 | Comments (5)
  1. “Mr. “Hopenchange” has revealed himself to be a thin-skinned, bitter, unprepared, detached, aloof, and arrogant politician unwilling to admit his own mistakes and lacking in any kind of graciousness and class typically associated with the office of the President of the United States”. You sir, don’t know what you are talking about — Obama is the classiest president we have had in living memory. And please tell me the name of the last president who didn’t use a tele-prompter? Why even mention it? It was a good speech and he is a very good president.

    Comment by drewsi — January 28, 2010 @ 1:42 am

  2. Agree that it was pretty bad, Doug.

    Here’s my view of what Obama might have said (if he were facing reality) at my website:


    Comment by Dave Richard — January 28, 2010 @ 3:47 am

  3. The electorate is polarized because the rhetoric coming from the right now is every bit as shrill and angry as it was from the left during the Bush administration and as it was from the right during the Clinton administration before that. Everyone needs to step back and examine their lives. Is it really that bad for most people and is it because of government? Absolutely not. On both counts.

    Comment by Rob — January 28, 2010 @ 8:04 am

  4. Thanks for your comment Rob. Perhaps if taken in the present tense, the answer may be no – unless, of course, you’ve been unemployed for a long time. And whether or not the present situation is because of government or not, well that can be debated either way.

    I think what is worrying people (and, I believe preventing real movement on the unemployment front) is the direction of things. You have a country where all the “baby boomers” are just starting to enter their retirement years, and no one in government has seriously sought to addresss the coming crises in Social Security, Medicare, health care, etc. And to think the government can simply tax and spend their way out of these crises is beyond absurd. Piling up debt we can not afford while ignoring what I think are truly big issues no one wants to talk about – Democrat or Republican – that’s what has everyone on edge.

    I’m not saying the Republicans have all the answers, because they’re as culpable as the Democrats are, since both parties have had ample time over the last 2+ decades to attempt to address these issues, but both parties have demogogued their way around it.

    Things may indeed not be that bad now, but I have a feeling things are going to get far worse before – if ever – they get better. People voted for Barck Obama because they really thought, based on his promises, he was going to be different, he was going to transcend “politics as usual”. The fact he’s been revealed as just another hack pol incapable or unwilling to take truly bold steps in leadership (and I’m not talking about recycling decrepit “New Deal” ideas from over seventy years ago that have no application in the 21st century) is disheartening and even frightening to people.

    You’re right about this: people have to step back and examine their lives, and take control over them. It’s pointless to wait and hope for government to do anything for you – hell, New Orleans has found that out. The time is quickly coming when no President and no government will be able to save and support us all, and it will be ever man for himself.

    Comment by The Great White Shank — January 29, 2010 @ 9:44 pm

  5. My apologies for the delay in posting drewsi’s and Dave Richard’s comments. This new WordPress is a pain in the neck, as it requires someone’s first comment to be approved by me, and then you’re free to post at will forever going forward.

    Thanks to you both for your comments, and come back again soon, y’hear? We here in the ‘Nation love hearing from people who want to agree or disagree with The Great White Shank – diversity of views is the spice of blogging!

    Comment by The Great White Shank — February 1, 2010 @ 5:37 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Search The Site

Recent Items


September 2021
April 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006



4 Goodboys Only

Site Info