May 31, 2009

After my comments the other day, friend and commenter Jana seemed concerned about my conservative heart and health (although, I might point out, she didn’t say I was wrong!), but I have to post this because even the most ardent supporter of President Obama’s “Hope and Change” message ought to be concerned at the administration’s confusion over what to do about North Korea, and recent comments and actions involving his Department of Justice threatening to silence critics and make policy based solely on politics. In just the past few days, consider the following:

1. The DoJ’s dropping of charges against Black Panther members accused of intimidating poll workers and voters at a Philadephia voting station last election day:

The three black panthers, Minister King Samir Shabazz, Malik Zulu Shabazz and Jerry Jackson were charged in a civil complaint in the last days of the Bush administration with violating the voter rights act by using coercion, threats and intimidation. Shabazz allegedly held a nightstick or baton that prosecutors said he pointed at people and menacingly taped it. Prosecutors also say he “supports racially motivated violence against non-blacks and Jews.”

The complaint says they hurled racial slurs at both blacks and whites.

A poll watcher who provided an affidavit to prosecutors in the case noted Democrat Bartle Bull, who worked as a civil rights lawyer in the south in the 1960’s and is a former campaign manager for Robert Kennedy, said it was the most blatant form of voter intimidation he had ever seen.

In this case, the DoJ actually won the case initially, but then appears to have been pressured by the administration (hmmm…I wonder who) to drop the charges against those indicted.

2. North Korea has been, to put it mildly, exhibiting rather belligerant behavior recently since successfully testing a nuclear device – firing missiles, terminating the Korean War armistice agreement, and generally threatening war on anyone who they believe ‘disses them. In the face of such aggressive actions, what has the administration done? Let’s make this a multiple-choice question:

a) condemn NK and call them a threat
b) downplay NK’s recent actions and say there’s no real crisis
c) ask the UN to look into it
d) admit NK’s actions are, in fact, a threat after all
e) all of the above

If you answered e) you are, of course, correct. Hot Air’s Ed Morrissey is keeping score. The Obama administration has been all over the map on the NK thing and has yet to put forth a cohesive message, but I’m sure they’ll get it right one of these days. We can only hope – you can bet Russia, Iran, Al-Qaeda, and other aggressors around the world are enjoying President Spineless and his incessant America-bashing, “let’s talk this out” drone while America’s perceived interest and willingness to combat aggression around the world declines on a daily basis. I guess Joe Biden was right after all.

3. Thanks also to Captain Ed for calling attention to something that you would think the mainstream media would consider somewhat notable: the Obama administration’s plans to silence critics of how his so-called “stimulus” money is being spent. The captain has it exactly right:

Remember when the Left took to the streets to declare dissent “patriotic” during wartime? I didn’t have a problem with dissent then, but apparently the Left has a curious definition of “patriotism”. Now, suddenly, the federal government can silence their critics at will, not to protect critical national-security programs or keep from undermining a war effort, but to protect a Democratic president intent on seizing control of private industry across a wide swath of the nation. Suddenly, that kind of dissent threatens America.

You can bet that if this were a message coming from a McCain administration the Democrats, the ACLU, and their kiss-a$$es in the mainstream media would be squealing like pigs But because this is, after all, the Anointed One, not a peep…

4. Finally, one shouldn’t be surprised that this new administration – one that sees everything in terms of politics and gaining and consolidating power, would go after Maricopa County (AZ) sheriff Joe Arpaio (our sheriff, BTW) for his tactics to combat crime and illegal immigration. Once again, the administration’s DoJ has been assigned the role of pit bull:

The lawyers representing a controversial Arizona sheriff who is under investigation for his treatment of Latino residents accused officials in the Justice and Homeland Security departments yesterday of political motivations in pursuing probes against their client.

Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio and his office, which have drawn widespread attention for an unorthodox approach to crime and punishment, are the focus of three federal investigations into whether they violated federal rules or civil rights laws in pursuing illegal immigrants.

The fact that DHS is also involved should be of no surprise here, since its head honcho, Janet Napolitano, was previously the governor of AZ and by no means a supporter of Sheriff Joe. (He has, however, a great deal of popularity around here, I’ll tell you.) Given Napolitano’s recent missteps and misstatements, one would think DHS would have more important things to worry about.

See a troubling pattern emerging here? Morrissey is right on target when he observes, re: the Arpaio investigation):

Oh, sure, we understand. They will make those decisions based on the law, just as they did when they unilaterally reversed themselves in the [Black Panther] case after they’d won it. Because that was based on the law …. which found in the government’s favor … and which they then ignored.

Keep this in mind when the DoJ helps Norman Eisen determine who falls under the qualification of “anyone exerting influence on the [stimulus] process” in order to shut up its critics.

Robert Samuelson is right: the Obama infatuation by the media is the great unreported story of our time, and, going forward, an incredibly dangerous one for America. If this President truly believes he and his administration are above any form of criticism and immune from any scrutiny by the media or Congress (and it’s clear just months into his administration that this is exactly what they think, and why shouldn’t they?) one can only imagine how far they’ll want to take this.

Taken together, this administration’s actions recall those of a former president, though not necessarily the one the Anointed One loves to compare himself to. Rather than FDR, however, these actions appear to be downright Nixonian – a term I believe you’re going to be hearing a lot more of as this president becomes increasingly power-drunk and more full of himself.

Filed in: Politics & World Events by The Great White Shank at 01:23 | Comment (1)
1 Comment
  1. […] Wasn’t it yours truly who first compared Obama to Richard Nixon? Nobody listens to me, but then again everyone in the Goodboys Nation knows no one listens to The […]

    Pingback by GoodBoys Nation - Archives » Cool Down — July 29, 2009 @ 10:28 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Search The Site

Recent Items


September 2021
April 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006



4 Goodboys Only

Site Info