March 1, 2007

Watched a couple of not-so-new movies over the past couple of days that I thought were worth mentioning.

woo John Woo’s “Windtalkers”, starring Nicolas Cage, could have been a heck of a lot better than it actually was.

In short, this movie (about Marines charged with protecting Navajo Indian soldiers and the code they used to disguise U.S. military maneuvers from the Japanese during the battle of Saipan, seemed to have a hard time deciding what it wanted to be. Given Woo’s extensive use of graphic battle violence throughout the movie, it seemed like he was trying to do his own version of “Saving Private Ryan”, but the characters’ actions and personality traits made it seem to me more like the Vietnam-era “Platoon” than a World War II movie. Granted, I’m sure there were soldiers who never wanted to be there or felt disillusioned after experiencing the horrors of war for the first time, but I doubt many of them questioned why they were there, as was the case on several occasions here. Surely, Woo’s characters had heard of Pearl Harbor, hadn’t they?

The other thing that was disappointing about this flick is that Woo’s characters – even Cage’s shell-shocked veteran – bordered on stereotype, and his gratuitous use of bloodshed seemed so unnecessary. I mean, here you had the potential of a truly fascinating story – the clash of cultures experienced on both sides (not to mention the irony) as native Americans are called upon to use their own language and culture to protect the hides of the very kind of people who sought to exterminate them not so many generations before. To be able to tell such a story within the context of a vicious and bloody military campaign requires both a well-crafted script, characters with true depth, and a deft directorial touch, neither of which seemed to be present here. Too bad. The ending was really good, but everything before it, not so great.

On the other hand…

emilyrose “The Exorcism of Emily Rose” was a movie I found riveting, unsettling, and not just a little bit unnerving.

This movie, about a Roman Catholic priest on trial for the death of a young woman shortly after an exorcism he had attempted failed to work, was brilliantly acted, and both interesting and thought-provoking. In actuality, this movie is really a courtroom drama more than anything else, but the way it presents, touches, and asks us to consider the medical, pschological, and religious aspects of demonic possession allows all three possibilities to live and breathe without ridiculing one or the other, and – most importantly – giving the ending away.

The strange thing is, Tracey had to force me into watching this movie, and I went into it not expecting to like it at all. After all, I’d read a number of reviews by others on it and heard it was nothing but a hit-piece on religion and the Roman Catholic Church, but I found myself drawn in from the very start. The one thing that was really impressive to me was the way Emily’s “possession” and the exorcism scenes themselves were presented. Having read a number of works on the subject, I found both of these (and Tom Wilkinson’s priest/exorcist character as well) quite realistic and believable. And even if they weren’t, any time you get solid acting performances as there are throughout this film, how believable the story-line ends up being in the end doesn’t much matter.

So big-time kudos to “The Exorcism of Emily Rose” – I guarantee after watching it, you’ll never think of 3:00 AM the same way ever again.

Filed in: Uncategorized by The Great White Shank at 01:49 | Comments Off on Double Feature
No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Search The Site

Recent Items


September 2021
April 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006



4 Goodboys Only

Site Info