August 7, 2006

Things have reached a dangerous state in the Middle East, with the continued fighting between Israel and Hezbollah presenting all sorts of opportunities for things to go awry and further escalate. Syria’s army is now on a war footing, and it appears Lebanon’s government has finally begun to realize that Israel is not going away until the Hezbollah problem is resolved one way or the other. The diplomatic initiative working its way through the UN is DOA as a result of a number of Arab nations pushing for immediate Israeli withdrawal, and its clear that all the combatants in the conflict – both operational and tactical – recognize the UN as nothing more than a bunch of paper-pushers and resolution-seekers without any teeth.

I find it interesting, therefore, Lebanon’s and the Arab League’s request for a change to the proposed American-French draft resolution to include a call for “immediate withdrawal of some 10,000 Israeli troops from its soil”. They obviously know there’s no way Israel would agree to such a demand, which begs the question why they are calling for something they know will be rejected in the first place. It could only be for one of two reasons: 1) they want the current conflict to continue in the hope of further escalation into a regional conflict or that Israeli resolve will be diminished as time goes on; or 2) they want the current conflict to continue to further diminish Hezbollah as a military and political force within the region.

I think either of these reasons is plausible. The Arab street holds no love for Israel, so option 1 seems the most logical reason for the diplomatic initiative hold-up. But I personally believe it’s option 2 that is at work here. First of all, Saudi Arabia’s ongoing criticism of Hezbollah would seem to hint at a greater dissatisfaction by Arab governments with Hezbollah’s ill-advised (and, in the case of Iran, ill-timed?) provocation that led to the current conflict. Second, it’s hard to believe Lebanon’s government and civilian population can continue to support Hezbollah knowing its continued presence in that country will only lead to greater damage and destruction inflicted upon its infrastructure and economy.

There is, however, another angle that no one (at least to my knowledge) has sought to explore here – which is, Iran’s interest in this whole matter. Which is, that no matter what happens diplomatically or militarily between Hezbollah and Israel, Iran wins. Common wisdom says that Iran’s support of Hezbollah – both politically and, in the background, militarily – is indicative of Iran’s desire for it to succeed against Israel, but it’s my view that Iran has much more to gain by an escalation of hostilities that either brings Syria into the conflict, or even sees Hezbollah neutralized or defeated. Believe me, it’s not as far-fetched as you might think.

First of all, Hezbollah’s defeat would be viewed as its punishment for provocations and/or actions taken without Iran’s sanction or knowledge, thus showing like-minded countries or groups that you better tow Iran’s line or face a similar fate. Second, Iran can say it supported Hezbollah, but the latter’s defeat or failure only illustrates the need for a more powerful leader (guess who?) and forceful effort if Israel is to be both humbled and defeated once and for all. Finally, the current conflict provides Iran with a excellent opportunity to view what is and isn’t working militarily as its makes its own plans and preparations for armed conflict with Israel somewhere down the road.

While the world focuses on Israel and Lebanon, Iran bides its time as the 800-lb. gorilla no one wants to deal with.

The uncomfortable fact, however, is that whether it’s Israel, the U.S., or some future coalition of nations, sooner or later (and I believe events are pushing things towards sooner), Iran’s menace is going to have to be dealth with militarily. National Review’s Barbara Lerner opines that the time is now, restating something she has effectively argued before.

While no one wants to see current events spiral out of control and into a regional or, at worst, world-wide conflict, the sad truth is that, whether it’s today or weeks, months, or years from now, if you’re gonna strike Iran, better to do so at a time and making of your own choosing than theirs. There are no easy answers to what is happening – and will happen – in the Middle East; one must recognize, however, that in the oriental mindset (and, by that I’m talking the “Eastern” vs. “Western”), it is brute force, overwhelming power and steely resolve, not polite, limp-wristed diplomacy, that is most understood and respected. As the war between Israel and Hezbollah rages on and diplomats in New York and in capitals across the world seek a resolution via polite diplomacy, Iran waits, playing the U.S., the West, and the U.N. for chumps, knowing that its time is coming. How successful it will be at that time will all depend on the West’s resolve for dealing with a real and looming threat in a way no U.N. resolution or form of diplomacy can.

Filed in: Politics & World Events by The Great White Shank at 14:12 | Comments Off on What To Do About Iran?
No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Search The Site

Recent Items


September 2021
April 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006



4 Goodboys Only

Site Info